If restore performance is your only consideration, I’d strongly weigh that (now less impactful) benefit against the benefits of hardened repositories, the performance cost on the target repository for backups, and simplicity of offloads. In the past, Reverse was the way to go for fast restores because the most recent point was always a full, but a lot has changed with the restore engine in past years, and now you ought get pretty good performance regardless of the restore mode. Secondary Features as Joe mentioned like Hardened Repositories and offloading.Performance: Reverse incremental has highest performance requirements on the target repository.Terms of Reverse Incremental vs (Forever) Forward Incremental, your concerns are always:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |